Arbitration procedures and practice in Turkey: overview
A Q&A guide to arbitration law and practice in Turkey.
The country-specific Q&A guide provides a structured overview of the key practical issues concerning arbitration in this jurisdiction, including any mandatory provisions and default rules applicable under local law, confidentiality, local courts' willingness to assist arbitration, enforcement of awards and the available remedies, both final and interim.
To compare answers across multiple jurisdictions visit the Arbitration procedures and practice Country Q&A Tool.
This Q&A is part of the multi-jurisdictional guide to arbitration. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit www.practicallaw.com/arbitration-mjg.
Use of arbitration and recent trends
Use of commercial arbitration
Commercial arbitration in Turkey is not widely used for domestic disputes compared to litigation. Arbitration is not seen as a cost-effective method to resolve domestic disputes which do not involve significant amounts. However, arbitration is widely used to resolve international disputes. The main legal areas which commonly use arbitration are:
As a party to the UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention), it is possible to apply to the Turkish courts to enforce an arbitral award granted in the territory of a foreign signatory country.
Since arbitration is becoming more popular in international commercial disputes, national courts are becoming increasingly familiar with this alternative dispute resolution method. The recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Turkey is allowed if the relevant conditions are met.
There is a draft law, which has not yet been ratified, proposing the establishment of an arbitration centre in Istanbul for the resolution of domestic and international disputes. It may be ratified by the end of 2013.
Arbitration for domestic disputes has no particular advantages over litigation where the subject matter of the dispute does not involve significant amounts since it is relatively costly. Advantages include:
Specialisation (that is, expertise of the arbitrator in a specific business sector, for example).
Freedom to agree the language of the arbitration proceeding, allowing for the more active participation of foreign parties.
There is a distinction between provisions relating to domestic and international arbitration. Both sets of rules are largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 (UNCITRAL Model Arbitration Law).
Domestic arbitration. The Code on Civil Procedure (Law No. 6100) (published in the Official Gazette dated 4 February 2011 and numbered 27836) (CCP) contains the provisions that apply to disputes that have (Articles 407 to 444):
no foreign element; and
agreed Turkey as the place of arbitration.
International arbitration. The only specific code relating to international arbitration proceedings is the Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC) (Law No. 4686) (published in the Official Gazette dated 5 July 2001 and numbered 24453). The TIAC contains the primary provisions to be applied in disputes:
with a foreign element where Turkey is the agreed place of arbitration; or
where the parties, arbitrator or arbitral tribunal have agreed that the TIAC will apply.
Mandatory legislative provisions
In Turkey, the application of the principle of freedom of contract means that parties are free to agree on the rules of procedure to be applied in arbitration proceedings, whether through specifically agreeing their own procedure or by referring to institutional rules (Article 424, Code on Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 15, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). This is on the basis that the mandatory provisions in the CCP and TIAC are respected. These include, for example, the rules that the parties are treated equally and that due process is provided for parties to raise their claims and defences. If the parties do not agree on the rules of procedure, the sole arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal conducts the arbitration proceeding in accordance with the default rules of the CCP or the TIAC.
In domestic arbitration, arbitration cannot be used to resolve disputes which either (Article 408, Code on Civil Procedure (CCP)):
Arise from immovable assets.
That are governed by areas of law that are not subject to the parties' choice (such as family law matters or those relating to public order).
In such circumstances, or where the award is contrary to public order, the court can cancel the award (Article 439, CCP) (see Question 25). A similar rule applies to international arbitration (Article 15, TIAC).
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, in both a domestic and international arbitration an arbitral award on the merits of the case must be granted within one year from the date of either the (Article 427, Code on Civil Procedure and Article 10/B, Turkish International Arbitration Code):
Appointment of the arbitrator (where there is one arbitrator).
Publication of the minutes of the first meeting of the arbitral tribunal (where there is more than one arbitrator).
The arbitration period can be extended by agreement. If the parties fail to reach agreement, either party can request an extension from the competent civil court of first instance. If the court rejects the request, the arbitration proceedings will end at the expiry of the arbitration period. The judgment of the court is final and binding.
Arbitration proceedings can be brought within the same limitation period as the legal proceedings of the right or claim subject to the arbitration proceedings.
For large commercial disputes, the two main arbitration organisations commonly used in Turkey are:
These organisations have a list of arbitrators and their own arbitration rules in respect of both domestic and international arbitration.
The International Chamber of Commerce Turkish National Committee (Milletlerarası Ticaret Odası Türkiye Milli Komitesi) (www.icc.tobb.org.tr) organises seminars and training on domestic and international arbitration but does not conduct arbitration proceedings.
See box, Main arbitration organisations.
Article 412 of the Code on Civil Procedure (CCP) in the case of domestic and Article 4 of the Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC) in the case of international arbitrations, set out the definition and formal requirements for the validity of an arbitration agreement. A valid arbitration agreement must be:
Executed between the parties with the aim of resolving a part or all of the disputes which have arisen or which may arise from the legal relationship between them, whether from a contract or not.
In writing. It can be an arbitration clause in a contract or a separate agreement. This requirement is considered fulfilled if there is:
a written document signed by the parties;
written communications between the parties confirming agreement (for example, letter, telegraph, telex, fax or electronically);
no objection to the petition for arbitration claiming that there is a written arbitration agreement; or
reference to a document containing an arbitration clause, provided it is part of the main contract;
Accord with the rules of the jurisdiction agreed by the parties. In the absence of an agreement on jurisdiction, it must be valid in accordance with Turkish law.
If the main contract is invalid, this does not necessarily affect the validity of the arbitration agreement. In addition, an arbitration agreement can be validly established for a dispute which has not yet arisen.
Separate arbitration agreement
An arbitration agreement can be established as an arbitration clause in a contract or as a separate agreement (see above, Substantive/formal requirements).
Unilateral or optional clauses
An arbitration clause or agreement is defined as an agreement between the parties for all or several disputes which have arisen or may be arise from an existing legal relationship to be resolved through arbitration proceeding. An express and definite declaration of intent on this issue is one of the conditions of validity.
In numerous judgements, the Court of Appeal has stated that the resolution of a dispute through arbitration proceedings must be expressly and definitely agreed by the parties. Arbitration clauses that state that disputes which cannot be resolved through arbitration proceedings must be resolved before the courts or that the disputes can be resolved through both arbitration and litigation are void. The Court of Appeal has accepted that an arbitration clause or agreement granting one party the right to choose the arbitral tribunal is not valid. Such a clause or agreement is contrary to public policy since it provides an advantage in the proceedings to one party over the other. Accordingly, unilateral or optional clauses where one party has the right to choose arbitration are unlikely to be enforceable.
If the arbitration agreement is a clause in a main contract, the invalidity of the contract does not necessarily invalidate the arbitration agreement, provided the necessary requirements for a valid arbitration agreement are otherwise met (see Question 6). In theory, it is possible for a null and void contract to contain a valid arbitration clause.
Breach of an arbitration agreement
Court proceedings in breach of an arbitration agreement
If a claim is issued in court relating to a dispute that is the subject of arbitration proceedings, the other party can file an "objection of arbitration". If the court accepts the objection, the claim is rejected on procedural grounds. The objection of arbitration must be filed as a first objection in the response petition of the defendant (the court cannot consider this issue at a later date).
If the defendant fails to file an objection of arbitration, it is deemed to have waived its right to arbitration. Turkish courts do not have authority to restrain proceedings commenced overseas in breach of an arbitration agreement (Article 413, Code of Civil Procedure and Article 5, Turkish International Arbitration Code).
Arbitration in breach of a valid jurisdiction clause
Parties cannot apply to have the dispute resolved by arbitration if a dispute resolution clause in the agreement between them provides that disputes are to be resolved through litigation (see Question 6)
Turkish courts do not have the authority to grant an injunction to restrain proceedings started overseas in breach of an arbitration agreement (see Question 9, Court proceedings in breach of an arbitration agreement).
Joinder of third parties
There are no specific provisions under Turkish law regulating the joinder of a third party to arbitration proceedings. If all the parties consent to joinder, a multi-party arbitration clause can be drafted. However, a high number of parties can give rise to practical problems such as agreement on the choice of arbitrators.
Number and qualifications/characteristics
In the case of both domestic and international arbitration, parties can determine the number of arbitrators but it must be an odd number (Article 416, Code on Civil Procedure and Article 7, Turkish International Arbitration Code). In the absence of express agreement, the default number of arbitrators is three. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, only real and not legal persons can be appointed as arbitrators. With regard to the qualifications/characteristics of arbitrators, see Question 13.
Under Turkish law, arbitrators must be impartial and independent (Article 416 to 417, Code on Civil Procedure and Article 7, Turkish International Arbitration Code). A person who is asked to act as an arbitrator must disclose any circumstances or interests which could create doubt as to his impartiality and independence. If the parties were not informed of any interests before the arbitrator's appointment, the arbitrator must immediately do so, in the event the issue of bias arises later. The parties can reject an arbitrator in cases where the arbitrator's independence or impartiality is in doubt.
Appointment of arbitrators
The parties can agree on a procedure for the appointment of arbitrators in both domestic and international arbitrations (Article 416, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 7, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). In the absence of an agreed procedure, the Articles set out default provisions to be applied:
Disputes to be resolved by a sole arbitrator. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, a party can ask the court to appoint one. For domestic arbitrations, the competent court is the district court at the place of arbitration. If the place of arbitration is not agreed, the competent court is the district court where the defendant has its domicile, habitual residence or place of business. (District courts have not yet been established. Courts of first instance presently determine these issues.)
For international arbitrations, the competent court is either (Article 3, TIAC):
the court where the defendant has its domicile, habitual residence or place of business; or
the civil court of first instance of Istanbul.
Disputes to be resolved by three arbitrators. Each party must appoint one arbitrator. The two appointed arbitrators must then appoint the third arbitrator. If a party fails to appoint its arbitrator within 30 days of receiving a request from the other party to do so, or if the two arbitrators fail to agree on the third arbitrator within 30 days of their appointment, the appointment is made, at request of a party, by the civil court of first instance. The third arbitrator then acts as the chairman.
Disputes to be resolved by more than three arbitrators. When there are more than three arbitrators, the parties must equally appoint the arbitrators who then appoint the last arbitrator, in accordance with the procedure explained above.
Removal of arbitrators
A party can reject an arbitrator on any one of three grounds (Article 417, CCP and Article 7/c, TIAC):
Lack of requisite qualifications. An arbitrator can be challenged if he does not meet the qualifications the parties have determined to be necessary.
Partiality or dependency. An arbitrator can also be challenged if circumstances exist or arise that give rise to reasonable doubts as to his impartiality or independence.
Grounds determined by the parties under arbitration law. An arbitrator can be challenged under any of the provisions for challenge under arbitration law, determined by the parties. The grounds of challenge for the judges under Article 36 of the CCP can be referred to in this respect. Pursuant to the said article, it is deemed that a ground for the challenge to judge exists in cases where:
the judge has given advice to or lead either party;
the judge has disclosed its opinion on the lawsuit to either party or to a third party even though such disclosure is not required by law;
the judge has been heard as a witness or an expert or acted as judge or arbitrator in the proceedings;
there is collateral consanguinity between the judge and either party; and
there is dispute or hostility between the judge and either party during the proceedings.
Grounds for challenging an arbitrator can also be determined by the parties.
Parties can also agree on a preferred procedure for challenging an arbitrator. In the absence of an agreed procedure, a challenge can only be made within two weeks of a party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge in the case of domestic arbitrations and 30 days in the case of international arbitrations.
Commencement of arbitral proceedings
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the first step for the commencement of an arbitration proceedings is to give notice of the arbitration and nominate the arbitrator (Article 428, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 10, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). Depending on the parties' agreement or the rules of the arbitral institution, this can be done by filing a request for arbitration must be filed with the competent arbitral institution and serving this on the respondent. In an ad hoc arbitration, the request or notice of arbitration is served only on the respondent.
The request for arbitration contains:
The claimant's nomination of an arbitrator.
The relevant facts.
A legal analysis of the case.
The CCP and TIAC do not provide any rules on how to serve the statements and other submissions in international arbitrations. Documents commencing arbitration proceedings do not need to be served through judicial or diplomatic channels, unlike court proceedings. As long as the delivery method is recorded, the method is deemed adequate.
Applicable procedural rules
The parties can determine the procedural rules that apply (see Question 3).
In the absence of the parties' agreement on the rules of procedure, the rules apply that are set out in the Code of Civil Procedure, in the case of domestic arbitrations, and the Turkish International Arbitration Code, in the case of international arbitrations (see Question 3).
Any petition, information or document submitted to the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal must be served on the other party (Article 429, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 11/A, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). Parties must also submit evidence within the period indicated by the arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal.
If a party does not provide the other party or the arbitral tribunal with the documents, information or evidence ordered to be disclosed, the arbitral tribunal is not entitled to enforce disclosure. However, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can request the assistance of the competent court of evidence, which will apply the provisions of the CCP and take the steps required for the disclosure and collection of evidence (Article 137, CCP). The courts can order that evidence ordered to be disclosed can be disclosed by the relevant governmental bodies and third parties in possession of the relevant evidence (Article 195, CCP). Alternatively, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can continue the proceedings and grant an award based on the existing evidence.
Scope of disclosure
Parties can attach written evidence to their petitions or they can refer to evidence which they intend to submit later (Article 428, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 10/D, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). If a party does not submit evidence, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can continue the proceedings and grant the award based on the existing evidence (see Question 17).
If the dispute between the parties arises out of a contract, the contract and any translations must be submitted, if translations are necessary for the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal.
Disclosure in arbitration proceedings varies depending on the procedural rules that are agreed and applied. The procedure for the submission of evidence in civil litigation is regulated under the CCP and disclosure is not obligatory. A general comparison between arbitration proceedings and litigation in terms of the extent of the disclosure is, therefore, not feasible since disclosure in arbitration proceedings can vary so widely.
Parties can agree the rules of disclosure. In the absence of agreement, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can determine a specific method for the submission of documents. If a method is not determined, the parties can submit their documents or evidence in any form including electronic, such as CDs, DVDs and USB flash drives.
The Code of Civil Procedure and the Turkish International Arbitration Code do not contain specific provisions on confidentiality in arbitration proceedings. However, the nature of the proceedings and the reasons parties choose arbitration means that in practice proceedings are private and confidential. The parties can also expressly agree on a confidentiality term in the arbitration agreement.
Courts and arbitration
Local courts do not generally have jurisdiction to give judgement on a dispute concerning arbitration proceedings that are based on a valid arbitration agreement.
In domestic arbitrations, the courts can intervene in the circumstances specified in Article 411 of the Code of Civil Procedure, such as enforcing an injunction, collecting evidence or cancelling an arbitral award (see Question 25).
In international arbitrations, the courts can intervene in certain situations, to (Article 3/2, Turkish International Arbitration Code):
Grant provisional and protective measures before the arbitral tribunal is constituted.
Assist in enforcing or obtaining provisional and protective measures ordered by the arbitral tribunal, if a party does not comply voluntarily with such measures.
Assist in taking evidence requested by the arbitrators to support the arbitration.
Appoint an arbitrator if a party fails to appoint its arbitrator or if the arbitrators appointed by two parties fail to agree on the third.
Decide on whether an application for challenge can be made (unless the parties have already agreed on an arbitral institution to do so) to relieve the parties or the arbitrators if they are unable to reach a decision.
Grant an extension of time if an award cannot be made within the necessary time limit.
Risk of court intervention
The role of local courts in arbitration proceedings is limited (see Question 20). The intervention permitted by the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) or the Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC) is intended to facilitate the course of the arbitration proceedings and does not in practice cause a risk of frustration.
Neither the CCP nor the TIAC contain specific provisions regarding the delay of arbitration proceedings by frequent court applications. If a party does not attend the arbitration hearing without a valid cause or fails to present evidence, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can proceed and grant an award based on the existing evidence.
If a party intentionally delays the arbitration proceedings by frequent court applications, this may constitute an "abuse of right" under Article 2 of the Turkish Civil Code (Law No. 4721) (published in the Official Gazette dated December 8, 2001 and numbered 24607).
The arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction, including objections to the validity of the arbitration clause (Article 422, Code of Civil Procedure and Article 7/H, Turkish International Arbitration Code). If one party claims the sole arbitrator or arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction, the claim must be filed with the response petition.
There are no specific provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) or Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC) regarding security for costs. Accordingly, there are no restrictions on the arbitral tribunal awarding security if it considers it necessary. See also below, Other interim measures.
Other interim measures
In domestic arbitrations, unless otherwise agreed, the sole arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can grant a preliminary injunction decision or order the determination of evidence at the request of a party (Article 414, CCP). The determination of evidence is a measure which ensures that relevant evidence for the claim is gathered and protected to prevent its loss before the evidence is examined. For example, in the case of an accident, the court can decide (at the request of a party) that the relevant evidence is determined before the trial since it might otherwise be lost or damaged.
In international arbitrations, unless otherwise agreed, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can grant a preliminary injunction or a preliminary attachment decision at the request of a party (Article 6, TIAC).
The arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can also require a party to deposit security before it makes a decision on a preliminary injunction or preliminary attachment (Article 414, CCP). However, in respect of international arbitrations, the TIAC states that for decisions that require the involvement of a forced execution authority or other official authority, the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal cannot grant a preliminary injunction or preliminary attachment decision. In addition, preliminary measures granted by the arbitral tribunal are not binding on third parties.
The right of parties to request interim measures in accordance with Articles 257 to 268 of the Execution and Bankruptcy Law and the CCP is reserved (Article 6, TIAC).
A sole arbitrator can grant awards. In the case of an arbitral tribunal, awards are granted by a majority vote (Article 433, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 13, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). Unless otherwise agreed, an arbitrator or arbitral tribunal can grant a partial award (Article 436, CCP and Article 14, TIAC).
At the request of the relevant party, awards can be granted for:
Interest applied (if any).
Awards must also include relevant costs (Article 436, CCP and Article 16, TIAC).
Rights of appeal/challenge
An arbitral award can be appealed by filing a cancellation lawsuit in the relevant court (Article 439, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 15, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)).
Grounds and procedure
Cancellation lawsuits are considered urgent matters (Article 439, CCP and Article 15, TIAC). The grounds for cancellation include:
Lack of legal standing of a party.
Invalidity of the arbitration clause.
Procedural errors in the appointment of arbitrators.
Failure to grant the arbitral award within the legal period.
Incompetence by the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal or an incompetent decision contrary to law.
Failure to grant the arbitral award in respect of part or all of the claim.
Procedural errors in the conduct of the arbitration proceedings.
Unfair treatment of the parties.
The subject-matter of the dispute is not appropriate for arbitration under Turkish law.
The award is contrary to public order.
See Question 3.
Excluding rights of appeal
The parties can partially or totally waive their right to file a cancellation lawsuit.
Clients and lawyers can agree legal fees. There is a tariff regulating the minimum fee that is based on a percentage of the amount in dispute. The success fee of the successful party's lawyer is determined by the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal in accordance with the minimum fee tariff (Article 441, Code of Civil Procedure and Article 16, Turkish International Arbitration Code).
The unsuccessful party must pay the costs of the arbitration (Article 442, Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and Article 16, Turkish International Arbitration Code (TIAC)). If both parties are partially successful, the costs of the arbitration are divided between them according to the extent of their success.
The arbitrators' fees.
The arbitrators' travel and other expenses.
Expert fees and examination fees.
Witness fees (if any).
Court fees (if any).
Notification expenses relating to all mandatory notifications during the arbitration proceedings such as the notification of the petition or award.
Costs are calculated by the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal and included in the award.
The arbitrator or arbitral tribunal considers factors such as the:
Conduct of the parties during the arbitration proceedings.
Expenses incurred in preparation for the proceedings including the cost of:
Enforcement of an award
An arbitration award obtained in Turkey is enforceable in the local courts when it becomes final and binding. For international disputes, see Question 29.
Turkey has been a party to the New York Convention since 30 September 1992. Therefore, arbitral awards obtained in Turkey can be enforced in other signatory states. Turkey’s participation in the New York Convention is subject to reservations. Turkey applies paragraph 3 of Article 1 of the New York Convention only with respect to the recognition and enforcement of an award rendered in a signatory state in accordance with the reciprocity principle and that it must apply the New York Convention only to the disputes arising from contractual or non-contractual legal relationships and the disputes which are deemed as commercial under its domestic law.
When evaluating the enforceability of a foreign arbitral award, Turkish courts take into consideration Article 5 of the New York Convention. Article 60 of the International Private and Procedural Law (Act No. 5718) states that foreign arbitral awards that are final and executable or binding on the parties can be enforced.
According to Article 62 of the International Private and Procedural Law, a competent court can refuse a request for an enforcement order of a foreign arbitral award under the following circumstances:
No arbitration agreement was made or no arbitration clause is included in the main contract.
The arbitral award is contrary to the public decency and order.
The dispute subject to the arbitral award cannot be settled through arbitration according to Turkish laws.
One of the parties was not properly represented before the arbitrators and afterwards has not expressly accepted the proceedings.
The party against whom an enforcement order is requested was not properly informed of its choice in the appointment of arbitrators or has been deprived of the opportunity of filing its claims and defences.
The arbitration agreement or clause is invalid and void according to the governing law accepted by the parties or, in the absence of an agreement on governing laws, according to the laws of the country where the arbitrators made their award.
The appointment of arbitrators or the procedure followed by them is contrary to either the agreement of the parties or the laws of the country where the arbitrators made their award.
The arbitral award is related to a question which is not included in the arbitration agreement or clause or it exceeds the limits of the agreement or clause.
The arbitral award has not yet become final or enforceable or binding according to the governing law or the law of the country where it was granted, or it has later been repealed and annulled by the competent authority of that country.
The court grants or refuses the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards at inter party proceedings. Its decision can be appealed and reviewed by the Court of Appeal. The filing of an appeal request suspends execution of the decision.
As New York Convention signatories, US and UK arbitral awards, are generally enforceable.
Length of enforcement proceedings
The length of enforcement proceedings varies according to each specific case. Generally, enforcement proceedings in the local courts can take approximately one year with an additional year for any appeal process. There is no expedited procedure for enforcement and no general difference between domestic and foreign awards in terms of the length of enforcement proceedings.
There are no changes to the legal framework, except for the draft law proposing establishment of an arbitration centre in Istanbul (see Question 1, Recent trends).
Main arbitration organisations
Istanbul Chamber of Commerce
Main activities. Administering domestic and international arbitration.
Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey
Main activities. Administering domestic and international arbitration.
International Chamber of Commerce Turkish National Committee
Main activities. Organising seminars and training programmes for domestic and international arbitration.
General Directorate of Legislation Development and Publication
Description. The official website maintained by the General Directorate of Legislation Development and Publication, Prime Ministry of the Republic of Turkey. It contains up-to-date information on all kinds of applicable legislation together with the abrogated laws. All information provided on this website is in Turkish. There is no official or formal English language translations of the relevant legislation.
Gökben Erdem Dirican
Pekin & Pekin Law Firm
Professional qualifications. Attorney-at-law registered with the Istanbul Bar Association
Pekin & Pekin Law Firm
Professional qualifications. Attorney-at-law registered with the Istanbul Bar
Areas of practice. Advice and specialist representation in complex and significant international arbitrations and the enforcement of foreign awards in Turkey.
- Assisted an international advertising company in co-operation with a Swiss law firm concerning a foreign arbitration lawsuit filed before the ICC International Court of Arbitration in Paris. Client obtained payment of US$3.5 million (including expenses related to the arbitration).
- Assisted a Turkish real estate company in an arbitration lawsuit filed against the client in Turkey for US$4.5 million in relation to a construction project. The arbitral tribunal in Istanbul ruled in favour of the client and rejected the claims for payment of US$3.5 million. The decision was approved by the Court of Appeal.
- Assisted a foreign textiles company in a dispute for the collection of client's receivables based on a foreign judgement awarded in the UK.