What's on Practical Law?
Section 184 review decision did not have regard to appellant's justification for excessive expenditure (Court of Appeal)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 0-563-0466 (Approx. 3 pages)
Section 184 review decision did not have regard to appellant's justification for excessive expenditure (Court of Appeal)
The Court of Appeal in Farah v London Borough of Hillingdon [2014] EWCA Civ 359 has allowed an appeal against a section 184 of the Housing Act 1996 decision that the appellant was intentionally homeless as she had failed to pay her rent in full for the privately-rented property that she previously resided in.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 0-563-0466© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 01-Apr-2014
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales