What's on Practical Law?
Factors relevant to decision whether to bifurcate proceedings (ICSID)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 1-533-2249 (Approx. 6 pages)
Factors relevant to decision whether to bifurcate proceedings (ICSID)
by Alejandro I Garcia, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
In Emmis International Holding BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2), the arbitral tribunal discussed a number of factors that could be considered when deciding whether to bifurcate arbitral proceedings into jurisdictional and merits phases.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 1-533-2249© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 03-Jul-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
Related Content- International