What's on Practical Law?

EIR cases apply UT Dransfield ruling in "manifestly unreasonable" publication decisions

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 1-535-2685 (Approx. 3 pages)

EIR cases apply UT Dransfield ruling in "manifestly unreasonable" publication decisions

On 14 July 2013, the First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights) ruled in two cases that environmental information must be published in response to requests under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391), as it was in the public interest to publish, and not manifestly unreasonable to do so. The tribunal applied the recent ruling of the Upper Tribunal in Information Commissioner v Dransfield [2012] UKUT 440 (AAC) on the test for whether requests were manifestly unreasonable or vexatious. (Silverman v Information Commissioner and another (EA 2013/0027) and Yeoman v Information Commissioner and another (EA 2013/0008).)

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 1-535-2685
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 24-Jul-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content