What's on Practical Law?
Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT)
Practical Law UK Legal Update 1-618-8383 (Approx. 5 pages)
Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT)
In Thompson v London Central Bus Company Ltd UKEAT/0108/15, the EAT considered a claim for associative victimisation and the nature of the connection between the claimant and the individual who had performed the protected act.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 1-618-8383© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 17-Sep-2015
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- European Union
- Scotland
- Wales