What's on Practical Law?

Whether decision to switch funding from legal aid to CFA and ATE insurance was reasonable (High Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 1-624-4893 (Approx. 3 pages)

Whether decision to switch funding from legal aid to CFA and ATE insurance was reasonable (High Court)

In Master Mehmet Edem Yesil v Doncaster & Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (unreported), 24 February 2016, (Kingston-Upon-Hull District Registry), the court considered whether the claimant's decision to switch funding from legal aid to a CFA and ATE insurance was reasonable, and whether the additional liabilities arising from the switch of funding were recoverable.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 1-624-4893
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 09-Mar-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content