In Apple Inc. v. BYD Co. Ltd., 2016 WL 1212638 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2016), the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted Apple’s motion to compel arbitration of patent infringement claims. Shenzhen-based BYD had originally brought the claims in the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court. However, BYD’s subsidiary had entered into an arbitration agreement with Apple that provided for International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration in California. The US court rejected BYD’s arguments that it did not have jurisdiction over BYD and that BYD had not manifested its intention to be bound by the arbitration agreement. The court held that BYD was bound by the arbitration agreement between Apple and BYD’s subsidiary under ordinary agency principles and therefore the arbitration agreement gave the US court jurisdiction over BYD.
The Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality) Bill [HL] 2015-16 will now have its second reading on the 22 April 2016, rather than 11 March 2016. The Bill proposes amendments to various statutes, including the Arbitration Act 1996, regarding the application of equality legislation to arbitration and mediation services.