What's on Practical Law?
No apparent bias, but unsatisfactory approach to evidence and arguments necessitates re-trial (Court of Appeal)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 1-630-0006 (Approx. 10 pages)
No apparent bias, but unsatisfactory approach to evidence and arguments necessitates re-trial (Court of Appeal)
In Harb v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz [2016] EWCA Civ 556, the court considered an appeal against a decision upholding an alleged oral agreement between the parties. In particular, the court examined whether the trial judge had erred in his approach to the evidence and in his factual conclusions, and whether there was an appearance of bias against the defendant.
Note: On 21 December 2016, the Supreme Court refused permission to appeal this decision (see Harb (Appellant) v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz (Respondent) UKSC 2016/0141).
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 1-630-0006© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 22-Jun-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales