What's on Practical Law?

High Court orders pre-action disclosure where confidential information was migrated to social-networking site

by PLC IPIT & Communications
The High Court has ordered pre-action disclosure in relation to a potential claim by Hays Specialist Recruitment (Holdings) Limited that an ex-employee (Mr Ions) had, during the course of his employment, copied and retained confidential information which he used after leaving Hays. Specifically, Hays alleged that Mr Ions had deliberately migrated details of business contacts from Hays' confidential database to his personal account at LinkedIn, an online business-oriented social-networking website, by uploading those contacts so that LinkedIn could invite the contacts by e-mail to join his network. Mr Ions argued that the migration was carried out with Hays' consent (since it had encouraged him to join LinkedIn) and that, once the business contact had accepted the invitation, the information ceased to be confidential as it could be seen by all Mr Ions' contacts. The High Court held that Hays had reasonable grounds for considering that it might have a claim, and ordered pre-action disclosure of certain documents. This case is an interesting example of how social-networking websites can be used to transfer confidential information and the importance of employers addressing these issues.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 3-382-1508
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Law stated as at 16-Apr-2008
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdiction
  • United Kingdom
Related Content