What's on Practical Law?
Irregularity in signing of Precedent H costs budget did not trigger sanction in CPR 3.14 (High Court)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 3-571-2446 (Approx. 3 pages)
Irregularity in signing of Precedent H costs budget did not trigger sanction in CPR 3.14 (High Court)
In Americhem Europe Ltd v Rakem Ltd [2014] EWHC 1881 (TCC), the court considered whether the fact that a Precedent H costs budget had not been signed by "a senior legal representative" of the party in question (as required by PD 3E.6) triggered the sanction in CPR 3.14 so that the party was deemed to have submitted a budget only in respect of the applicable court fees.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Resource ID 3-571-2446© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 17-Jun-2014
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales