What's on Practical Law?
Contractual pay progression clause did not provide for automatic pay increments (EAT)
Practical Law UK Legal Update 3-579-9086 (Approx. 6 pages)
Contractual pay progression clause did not provide for automatic pay increments (EAT)
In The Equality and Human Rights Commission v Earle UKEAT/0011/14 the EAT considered whether an employer that had implemented a government-imposed pay freeze had acted in breach of contract when it failed to operate a pay progression clause which expressly provided for annual pay reviews.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 3-579-9086© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Law stated as at 04-Sep-2014
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Scotland
- Wales