What's on Practical Law?

All parties are responsible and should pay costs for non-compliance with orders (Family Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 3-624-4825 (Approx. 3 pages)

All parties are responsible and should pay costs for non-compliance with orders (Family Court)

In Re L (Case Management: Wasted Costs) [2016] EWFC B8, non-compliance with disclosure orders due to omissions from the police and the hospital led to the fact-finding hearing being adjourned. All the parties paid wasted costs because they were all responsible for complying, monitoring and notifying the court of delays and non-compliance.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 3-624-4825
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 09-Mar-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content