What's on Practical Law?

Commercial Court rules on validity of amendment to applicable law and one-way jurisdiction clause

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 4-531-4705 (Approx. 5 pages)

Commercial Court rules on validity of amendment to applicable law and one-way jurisdiction clause

by Michael James, barrister and author
In Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd v Hestia Holdings Ltd and another [2013] EWHC 1328 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the argument that a one-way jurisdiction clause was ineffective to confer English jurisdiction.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 4-531-4705
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 05-Jun-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content