What's on Practical Law?

Swiss Supreme Court: inadmissibility of new arguments raised after first submission, including whether oral examination of witnesses is a fundamental procedural right

by Prof. Dr. Nathalie Voser (Partner) and Dr. Anna Kozmenko (Associate), Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd (Zurich)
Related Content
In decision BGer 4A_199/2014, the Swiss Supreme Court considered a petition to set aside an award on the ground that the arbitral tribunal had violated the petitioner's right to be heard, among other things because the tribunal did not hear witnesses whose cross-examination had been waived.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 4-590-7486
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 03-Dec-2014
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
  • Switzerland
Related Content