What's on Practical Law?
"Substantially enclosed" under regulation 2 does not produce a 50% rule (High Court)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 5-624-3165 (Approx. 3 pages)
"Substantially enclosed" under regulation 2 does not produce a 50% rule (High Court)
Newham Borough Council appealed an acquittal of the defendant on a charge of failing to cause a person to stop smoking in smoke-free premises under section 8 of the Health Act 2006. Newham appealed by case stated on grounds that the premises were "substantially enclosed" for the purposes of section 2 of the Act by reference to regulation 2 of the Smoke-free (Premises and Enforcement) Regulations 2006.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 5-624-3165© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 07-Mar-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales