What's on Practical Law?

Confirmation that local authorities are not required to apply for possession orders in cases involving temporary accommodation pending a homelessness review decision (Court of Appeal)

The Court of Appeal in R (ZH) v London Borough of Newham [2013] EWCA Civ 805 and R (CN) v London Borough of Lewisham [2013] EWCA Civ 804 has confirmed that it is still bound by the Court of Appeal decision in Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439 and, as such, is not required to apply for possession orders in cases involving applicants currently housed in temporary acccommodation following an adverse decision in relation to their homelessness application.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 6-534-5697
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 17-Jul-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content