What's on Practical Law?

Swiss Supreme Court considers revision ground (decision influenced by a crime) in context of setting aside petition

by PD Dr. Nathalie Voser (Partner, Zurich) and Aileen Truttmann (Associate, Geneva), Schellenberg Wittmer
In decision 4A_509/2013, the Swiss Supreme Court considered whether the conditions for revision of judgment in Article 123(1) of the Federal Statute on the Federal Tribunal (FSFT) (decision influenced by a crime) had been met in the context of a setting aside petition.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 6-558-6106
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 25-Feb-2014
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
  • Switzerland
Related Content