What's on Practical Law?
Clarification of jurisdiction to substitute a party named by mistake after limitation expired under CPR 19.5(3)(a) (High Court)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 6-605-9005 (Approx. 3 pages)
Clarification of jurisdiction to substitute a party named by mistake after limitation expired under CPR 19.5(3)(a) (High Court)
In American Leisure Group Ltd v Olswang LLP [2015] EWHC 629 (Ch), the court considered whether a master had jurisdiction to substitute a party under CPR 19.5 and, if so, whether he had correctly exercised his discretion under that jurisdiction to refuse substitution.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 6-605-9005© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 24-Mar-2015
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales