What's on Practical Law?
High Court must recognise Chinese judgments
Practical Law UK Legal Update 6-609-5838 (Approx. 5 pages)
High Court must recognise Chinese judgments
by Michael James, barrister and author
In Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV v Bank of China Ltd [2015] EWHC 999 (Comm), the High Court considered whether the claimant had submitted to Chinese jurisdiction, and whether public policy prevented the recognition of the Chinese judgments, when the dispute was subject to arbitration, and anti-suit injunctions had been made.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Resource ID 6-609-5838© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 21-Apr-2015
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales