What's on Practical Law?
Clarification given on when it is possible to change position at a later stage to give a neither confirm nor deny response in FOIA cases (FTT(IR))
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 6-627-8885 (Approx. 3 pages)
Clarification given on when it is possible to change position at a later stage to give a neither confirm nor deny response in FOIA cases (FTT(IR))
The First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights) in Frank Richardson v Information Commissioner (Dismissed Freedom of Information Act 2000) [2016] UKFTT 2015_0250 (GRC) has clarified when it is possible for a public authority to change its position at a later stage to give a neither confirm nor deny response after originally confirming that it held the information requested.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 6-627-8885© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 11-May-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales