What's on Practical Law?

Swiss Supreme Court: no review of arbitral tribunal's substantive findings in proceedings to set aside award; rights to be heard and to equal treatment overlap

by Dr Nathalie Voser (Partner) and Benjamin Moss (Associate), Schellenberg Wittmer (Zurich)
In decision 4A_672/2012, dated 23 April 2013 but only recently released, the Swiss Supreme Court considered an application to set aside an arbitral award on grounds that the tribunal breached the right to be heard and the right to equal treatment by allegedly failing to consider several important arguments made by one of the parties, resulting in incorrect findings of fact and law.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 7-532-3478
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 19-Jun-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
  • Switzerland
Related Content