What's on Practical Law?

Swiss Supreme Court considers arbitral jurisdiction in third party context and costs incurred by state proceedings

by PD Dr Nathalie Voser (Partner, Zurich) and Aileen Truttmann (Associate, Geneva), Schellenberg Wittmer
In 4A_232/2013, the Swiss Supreme Court considered whether an arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction over a claim for amounts due under a distribution agreement containing an arbitration agreement where invoices had been issued by another company and not the supplier. The Supreme Court also considered whether the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction to grant compensation for costs incurred as a result of state court proceedings started in breach of the arbitration agreement.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 7-549-9528
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 27-Nov-2013
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
  • Switzerland
Related Content