What's on Practical Law?

EAT gives guidance on how tribunals should deal with information received from third parties

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-571-4146 (Approx. 6 pages)

EAT gives guidance on how tribunals should deal with information received from third parties

In Begraj and another v Heer Manak Solicitors and others UKEAT/0496/13, the EAT considered how tribunals should proceed when given information by third parties that may be prejudicial to one or more of the parties to the case, and in what circumstances recusal will be appropriate.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 7-571-4146
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 19-Jun-2014
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Scotland
  • Wales
Related Content