What's on Practical Law?
The ambit of wardship and use of anti-tipping-off injunctions to protect children (High Court)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-614-1509 (Approx. 3 pages)
The ambit of wardship and use of anti-tipping-off injunctions to protect children (High Court)
In Re M (Children) [2015] EWHC 1433 (Fam), Munby P applauded the Family Division's response to concerns about a family who had tried to make its way to Syria to join the Islamic State. He explained why the wardship jurisdiction is the appropriate remedy in such cases and how anti-tipping-off orders should be used.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 7-614-1509© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 22-May-2015
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales