What's on Practical Law?
TUPE: employee was not re-assigned from an organised grouping despite third party instruction to remove (EAT)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-616-4826 (Approx. 5 pages)
TUPE: employee was not re-assigned from an organised grouping despite third party instruction to remove (EAT)
In Jakowlew v Nestor Primecare Services Ltd (t/a Saga Care) and another UKEAT/0431/14, the EAT considered whether, in the context of a TUPE service provision change, an instruction issued by a third party client to remove an employee from the provision of a service had the effect of re-assigning the employee away from the organised grouping.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Resource ID 7-616-4826© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 18-Jun-2015
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Scotland
- Wales