What's on Practical Law?

Polkey deduction revised by EAT due to tribunal's lack of reasons

Practical Law UK Legal Update 8-584-5646 (Approx. 6 pages)

Polkey deduction revised by EAT due to tribunal's lack of reasons

In Contract Bottling Ltd v Cave and another UKEAT/0100/14, the EAT considered an appeal against an employment tribunal's assessment of a 20% Polkey deduction for two employees whose redundancy dismissal had been found to be unfair.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

End of Document
Resource ID 8-584-5646
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 16-Oct-2014
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Scotland
  • Wales
Related Content