What's on Practical Law?
High Court considers whether to exclude hearsay evidence
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 9-605-4346 (Approx. 3 pages)
High Court considers whether to exclude hearsay evidence
In National Crime Agency v Azam [2014] EWHC 4742, the High Court considered whether the claimant was entitled to an order under CPR 32.1 and CPR 33.4 that the defendant could not rely on hearsay evidence, unless he called the witnesses and made them available for cross-examination at trial.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Also Found In
Resource ID 9-605-4346© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 20-Mar-2015
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdictions
Related Content- England
- Wales