What's on Practical Law?
ECHR holds Finnish court did not pay sufficient attention to "journalistic" hue of case
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 9-616-6645 (Approx. 3 pages)
ECHR holds Finnish court did not pay sufficient attention to "journalistic" hue of case
by Practical Law Media & Telecoms
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that in balancing the applicant's Article 10 right to freedom of expression against the complainant's conflicting Article 8 right to reputation a Finnish court had not paid sufficient attention to the "journalistic" hue of a case in which both parties were journalists. It also had not applied the balancing criteria in Von Hannover (no. 2) and Axel Springer v Germany. (Niskasaari and another v Finland (Application no. 32297/10), 23 June 2015.)
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Resource ID 9-616-6645© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 23-Jun-2015
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
Related Content- European Union