What's on Practical Law?

Coventry v Lawrence - Supreme Court decides by majority that pre-Jackson costs regime did not infringe ECHR (22 July 2015)

In Coventry and others v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50, the Supreme Court considered whether parts of the costs regime introduced by the Access to Justice Act 1999 (now repealed and replaced by LASPO 2012) in particular, a claimant’s right to recover any success fee and ATE premium from an unsuccessful defendant, infringed Article 6 of the ECHR and/or Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention.

Get full access to this document with a free trial

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

Learn more
  • Expert Guidance

    650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

  • Trust

    83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

  • Improve Response Time

    81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

Published on 22-Jul-2015
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content