Ask questions, browse answers and share your knowledge. Read our scope and rules.
- Under Regulation 72(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, would currency fluctuations count as "circumstances which a diligent contracting authority could not have foreseen"?
- Are the names of individuals who were on an evaluation panel appointed by a public body to decide on bids for grant funding personal data?
- Does the combined effect of regulation 32(5)(b) and 32(6) PCR 2015 mean that the contract awarded under Reg 32(5)(b) and any further recurrent contracts cannot be of a total duration of more than 3 years?
- What are the sanctions for non-compliance with an order for trial bundles in a judicial review to be lodged by a specified date?
- Is the governing document of a charity a public document?
Most read: Practice notes
Most read: Standard documents.
Visit our Brexit landing page for a collection of content on the legal implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU.
Our blog features posts on the latest thinking on various aspects of public sector law from our team and leading commentators.
Recent posts include:
- "Burdened with an excess of paper”: Administrative Court criticises voluminous evidence in judicial review proceedings
- What’s more difficult than decommissioning nuclear reactors? Ten Lessons from the recent judgment in Energysolutions EU Limited v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
- Avoiding loss by acquiescence: costs and concession in judicial review
Also see our regular digests on FOI and public procurement.
- Crown Commercial Service customer update November/December 2016 published
- Advocate General finds that core elements of Lithuanian procurement law are unlawful
- Advocate General proposes that Slovenian procurement of medicinal products is unlawful
- NDPB Lawyers' Group 13th training conference: 19 January 2017 (London)
- High Court refuses to make specific disclosure order in procurement challenge
Archbold Magistrates' Courts Criminal Practice 2016.