What's on Practical Law?
Share purchase agreements: restrictive covenants and boilerplate provisions (High Court)
Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-003-2481 (Approx. 8 pages)
Share purchase agreements: restrictive covenants and boilerplate provisions (High Court)
by Practical Law Corporate
In Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 2104, the High Court had to consider the meaning and effect of several provisions that are commonplace in share purchase agreements, including restrictive covenants given by sellers, a further assurance provision, a clause prohibiting assignment save in certain specified circumstances, a provision relating to the rights of third parties and a choice of jurisdiction clause.
Get full access to this document with a free trial
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
Learn more- Expert Guidance
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
- Trust
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
- Improve Response Time
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
End of Document
Resource ID w-003-2481© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 09-Sep-2016
Resource Type Legal update: case report
Jurisdiction
Related Content- United Kingdom